The Gender Crisis
   Date :06-Dec-2024
rhyme and reason new
 
By Kartik lokhande : 
 
There is a difference between freedom and licentiousness. While freedom comes with responsibilities, licentiousness treats all kinds of responsibilities as a burden -- or even coercion. Those trying to create an atmosphere wherein a boy or a girl feels ‘unsure’ about own gender, and wherein a male or a female is made to feel insecure about identifying as a male or a female as per the natural biological arrangement, are practising licentiousness. Preaching of ‘genderfluidity’ and ‘genderflux’ is aimed at hammering licentiousness into the minds of young people and destroying the larger societal stability earned collectively by humanity through evolution. 
 
SCIENCE is an oppressive construct since it demands proof. Society is an oppressive construct because it demands responsibility towards others. Likewise, there are several constructs -- language, geography, culture, cuisine, religion, ethnicity, gender etc -- and all of them are oppressive. For that matter, anything that has certain norms of social behaviour and discipline required for organised living, is oppressive. In short, whatever is the product of collective evolution of humanity over thousands of years of existence, is ‘oppressive’ because it is ‘imposed’ (By whom? No idea!). And, whatever is ‘fluid’ is the ‘real identity’ of a person. This is not a blabber, but a short description of the danger that is lurking in educational, corporate, intellectual, and socio-cultural spheres of life. This danger is being sanctified as ‘gender sensitisation’. One can say that this danger is operating like a virus in the well-intentioned framework of ‘gender sensitisation’, under which respect for natural genders is expected to be inculcated. The olden days were truly innocent. For, then, people believed in whatever was natural. A male was a male. A female was a female. A transgender was a transgender.
 
Exceptions, though it took time, were gradually accepted and the society created a space for them. However, certain forces in the world realised that they would not be able to come to power in any rules-based order or democratic process anywhere in the world. So, they started blaming every organised arrangement as a ‘construct’, and gradually, every ‘construct’ as ‘oppressive’. A new terminology evolved, which portrayed everything and anything natural, biological, systematic as negative. And, today, things have come to such a pass that humans have started inventing newer genders, going beyond what is naturally defined. Yes! Genders are being ‘invented’. Just because humans have this boon of ‘intellect’, some of them have started misusing this faculty to create social disorder. So, suddenly, one hears that a male is not a male because ‘he’ is feeling like a ‘she’. And, that too, is not for a lifetime. Rather, ‘he’ can be ‘she’ now, and later on switch back to being a ‘he’ again, depending upon what one is feeling at a particular time or in the company of a particular person. What was previously treated as a natural disorder is being converted into a psychological disorder, with deliberate attempts. Hence, even the terminology of LGBTQIA+ is ever expanding beyond lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual. One wonders if these many genders really exist in Nature?
 
This is unnatural. Beyond the uniqueness bestowed upon humans by Nature, the genders being invented are nothing but perversion promoting promiscuous conduct in people, especially youngsters. And, that is being wrongly associated with freedom. But, there is a difference between freedom and licentiousness. While freedom comes with responsibilities, licentiousness treats all kinds of responsibilities as a burden -- or even coercion. Those trying to create an atmosphere wherein a boy or a girl feels ‘unsure’ about own gender, and wherein a male or a female is made to feel insecure about identifying as a male or a female as per the natural biological arrangement, are practising licentiousness. Preaching of ‘genderfluidity’ and ‘genderflux’ is aimed at hammering licentiousness into the minds of young people and destroying the larger societal stability earned collectively by humanity through evolution. The youngsters are being deliberately exposed to this promotion of promiscuity through films, social media, theatre, OTT platforms, literature in an age when they are willing to ‘explore’ things. Sadly, such exposure is making them think that every pursuit of life is linked to sexuality. But, this feeling soon leaves them at a juncture when they are confused about their own gender choices, and hence, identity. This is the stage when they start telling everyone that their favourite topic for discussion, writing, blogging, drawing etc is ‘gender issues’. Some of them land into this quicksand of dysphoria and start a journey that leads them to nothing but playing a victim card. They champion victimhood in the name of assertion of gender identity, blame their own failures to ‘oppressive constructs’, and want their share of pie without earning enough merit.
 
They make the others, who achieve excellence in life and earn high positions through dogged determination, feel like perpetrators of crime. Gradually, all this leads to destabilisation of society in every walk of life. Even more sadly, this contributes to increasing psychological disturbances, building up of depression, and ruins lives of many families. But, then, for these ‘victims’, even families are ‘oppressive constructs’ that need to be demolished by branding all parents as ‘toxic’. Like any other political tool, gender identities serve as seeds for a new market economy that revolves around sex-related products.
 
Is it mere coincidence that sales of sex toys and other products including content have gone up since the invented genders invaded the senses of the general public? Well, sane people must think seriously. This is not to say that those naturally not falling into the categories of a man or a woman should be sidelined. No! But, this is to say that let rat be a rat, let cow be a cow, let cat be a cat, and let humans be humans. For, humans may invent psychological identities but Nature has no scope for it. A rat cannot be made to ‘feel’ like a tiger, because a rat is wise enough to know that Nature is supreme.