Vijay Phanshikar :
THE trigger is obvious -- Independence Day -- to indulge in a free-wheeling thinking on the
meaning of Independence for
common people. So, the ‘I-Day
musings’, so to say.
Of course, the word ‘Independence’ -- or ‘Freedom’ -- has multiple nuances, as highlighted by poets and
writers of all shades of different
ideologies. But, among the most important of these nuances is one of a sense of well-being under self-rule. And an important dimension of
well-being is good basic standards
of living.
This question springs up in the thought of every Nagpurian: Does Nagpur offer people a good, livable place? And the answer is ‘NO’ !
Bad urban design -- almost
everywhere, bad urban governance -- almost everywhere, bad sanitation and hygiene -- almost everywhere, filth and garbage dumps -- almost everywhere, water-logging after even small rain-spells -- almost everywhere, bad traffic management -- almost everywhere, bad upkeep of historical monuments -- almost everywhere, bad management of water bodies -- almost everywhere, badly-managed, unhygienic public hospitals -- almost everywhere, badly-managed
municipal or government schools -- almost everywhere ...!
Such a Nagpur !
It hardly gives the impression of a livable city -- even by national
standards, let alone the global norms.
Is this all what we had bargained for when the nation struggled for Independence from the alien rule?
Of course, every Nagpurian
realises that no one minds lack
of five-star facilities when one lives
in one’s own house. But should
that mean that we have a non-livable city even after 78 years of Independence?
Can anybody deny this reality in Nagpur’s case?
The city has numerous slums where life means
living in hell to common people with less than moderate resources.
The city still has many areas that have been inhabited in an
unauthorised manner (to which the State Government may offer
authorisation later).
The city still allows construction of shockingly tall buildings even on
disproportionately small plots -- with the help of a strange (and possibly unconstitutional) provision called Transferable Developmental Rights (TDR).
All these things -- and many more -- add up to the people’s feeling of helplessness about difficult living in the city of Nagpur. When the common people live under such a mental
condition for endless decades, can they really say that they are enjoying fruits of freedom?
Some may accuse the loosefooter of stretching the analogy of freedom (well-being) too much. But, to such an argument, all he can do is to remind them that the word ‘freedom’ must translate itself into something
concrete, something tangible,
something sensible by way of good basic standards.
Therefore, as we celebrate Independence Day, the loosefooter chooses to indulge in some public musings -- with the confidence that those match the aspirations of
fellow-Nagpurians.
n