By KARTIK LOKHANDE :
■ Increasing the public
engagement will not
only serve the purpose
of strengthening the
natural claim of India
over the glacier area but
also increase the pace
of infrastructure
development to aid
civilian movement.
India must focus on
taking the idea of
‘Oropolitics’ to the
ordinary people so as to
enhance their
knowledge of own
territory, issues
involved, and also to
make them participants
in strengthening the
natural territorial
claims.
THE world often talks
about the Siachen
Glacier, the highest
battlefield in the
world. Some even
question the need for India to
deploy her troops in the most
challenging terrain. Some even
suggest a ‘solution’ that the
Siachen Glacier should be converted into a ‘Peace Park’.
However, not many realise that
the need for occupying the mad
heights was forced upon India.
Had India not acted in time,
Pakistan would have secured
a perch by way of scoring a
brownie point in what is today
known as ‘Oropolitics’.
Many may not be familiar
with this term ‘Oropolitics’,
which refers to the use of
mountaineering for political
purposes.Though‘Oropolitics’
has been in practice since ages,
the term has been in use since
1970s particularly in the context of India-Pakistan rivalry to
control the daunting heights of
Siachen Glacier, where India is
placed firmly today.
Though the discussions centre around the Siachen Glacier,
the world’s highest battlefield,
it is not the only place where
two countries are locked in a
conflict. Human beings and
the empires they formed have
always been fascinated by the
thought of conquering the
heights to see how the plains
look like from there, or what
lays beyond a mountain.
Mountaineering, which
started as an exploration exercise to find out newer trade
routes, soon assumed political
significance. For example,
when the famous Silk Route
started attracting merchants
from India to Central Asia in
ancient times, several checkposts came up in the areas
dominated by certain groups.
These groups did not have any
means of livelihood at those
altitudes, and hence they started levying fees from passing
caravans. There were areas
where certain mountain tribes
attacked or looted the caravans if they were not paid.
As
the world evolved, the arduous
journeys were made smooth
with construction of roads,
rearranged geographies, organised legal systems of levy collection, and gradually trade
points opened under the joint
supervision of countries sharing the high-altitude borders.
This reduced the fascination
for the high altitudes for a while,
and snow-capped swathes and
peaks remained untouched for
a while. Again, mountaineering spirit arose and this time
they were accompanied by the
military representatives of
respective countries. Soon, this
turned mountaineering into
less of as an adventure activity and more of a political objective. The case in point being
Pakistan’s misadventurous
plan to capture heights in
Siachen Glacier area, taking
advantage of absence of specific defining line on map of
the time. In April of 1984, India
outsmarted Pakistan and
deployed forces on the Siachen
Glacier, which was very much
a part of Indian territory.Today,
the area has been attracting lot
of international attention as
Siachen Glacier is the source
of freshwater.
Of course, over the years, certain issues have cropped up
regarding troop sustenance,
massive expenditure involved,
evolution of technology to aid
the manpower deployed at the
icy heights. An entire industry
is dependent on mountaineering with politico-military objective.
May it be special clothing, gears, accessories
for the troops or aircraft and
air defence systems equipped
to ensure supply and counter
the potential threats. Satellite
images, Artificial Intelligencepowered drones all have
evolved. As the time will
progress, more advancements
may be brought into use.
Presently, research is going on
to grow nutritional vegetables
at high altitude, and to develop special food for the troops.
India holding the Siachen
Glacier assumes significance
from the point of view of preventing China and Pakistan
both from connecting with
each other with an intention
to alienate a large tract that
rightfully belongs to India. Over
the years, Pakistan has realised
that it does not have the level
of motivation as high as that
of an Indian soldier. Hence,
internationally, there is lobbying for demilitarisation of the
Siachen Glacier and declaring
the area as ‘Peace Park’. India
has thoughtfully decided not
to bow down to international
pressure. For, Pakistan can never be trusted. It has earned the
dubious distinction of being a
terror-sponsoring as well as
back-stabbing country.
In the present phase that
India is passing through, there
are many forces that would
want her to compromise on
her stand. If demilitarisation
plea does not work, these forces
will invoke climate change
issues. If that also does not
work, these forces may shadily try to use some politically
sidelined elements within India
to push the narrative that would
help Pakistan and its‘all-weather friend’ China.
The Indian
establishment will have to stay
stronger to withstand such
pulls and pressures. A possible
way out could be to carry out
scientific studies in the Siachen
Glacier area on various aspects
and publish those in a language
that could be understood by the
people. Besides, the establishment will have to increase the
opportunities, and even offer
subsidies, to increase the number of mountaineering expeditions to restricted number of
peaks in the glacier area.
Obviously, this must be done
without compromising on
security aspect.
Increasing the public
engagement will not only serve
the purpose of strengthening
the natural claim of India over
the glacier area but also
increase the pace of infrastructure development to aid
civilian movement. India must
focus on taking the idea of
‘Oropolitics’ to the ordinary
people so as to enhance their
knowledge of own territory,
issues involved, and also to
make them participants in
strengthening the natural territorial claims. This will give a
further boost to climatic, cultural, archaeological, biological, geological, and hydrological studies too in the area. The
strategic objectives will be
served in a better manner, as
multi-dimensional documentation will be of immense help.
The bottomline for India is
-- peace prevails only when
civilian and military components both are equally aware
and prepared to thwart the
designs of the inimical forces.