SEBI asks market infrastructure institutionsto resolve whistleblower complaints in 60 days
SEBI recently came out with guidelines
to strengthen accountability and
improvegovernanceofstockexchanges
and other market infrastructure institutions (MIIs)byasking them toresolve
whistleblower complaints within 60
days of receipt.
Additionally, SEBI asked MIIs, comprising stock exchanges, clearing corporations and depositories, to adopt
RegTech (regulatorytechnologies) and
SupTech (supervision technologies) for
better regulatory and supervisory
mechanisms.
Also, the regulator outlined guidelines for back office vendors, public
interest directors (PIDs) meetings,
establishing a standard operating procedure for disciplinary actions against
Key Management Personnel (KMPs),
disclosure of board meeting agendas
and minutes, quarterly reporting by
theCompliance Officer and half-yearly reporting by the Chief Risk Officer.
The new guidelines will become
effectivefromApril1, theSecuritiesand
ExchangeBoard of India (SEBI) said in
its circular.
On whistleblower policy,
SEBI asked MIIs to resolve whistleblower complaints within 60 days of
receipt.Theregulatorhas specified the
role of the audit committee in overseeing whistleblower complaints. It is
tasked with receiving and investigatingsuchcomplaintsandmakingappropriate decisions, including recommending further actions when necessary. The committee is required to
submit a detailed quarterly report to
the MIIs Governing Board, outlining
the complaints received, the actions
taken, and any unresolved issues. If a
decision cannot be reached on a particularmatter,itmust escalate theissue
to the Governing Board forresolution.
With regards to RegTech and
SupTech,SEBIaskedMIIstoimplement
systems enabling members or participants, such as stock brokers, clearing
members,anddepositoryparticipants,
to make submissions online, reducing
reliance on physical documentation.
These systems should generate alerts
andreports tosupportregulatoryobjectives.
Also,MIIs are required todisclose
key information about their members
or participants on their websites,
includingdetailsofinvestor grievances
(resolvedandpending) for thelast three
financial years, regulatory actions taken, net worth as of the previous financial year, and other relevant data.
Additionally, any significant regulatory non-compliance by a member
mustbesharedwithotherMIIstoensure
transparency and accountability. To
ensure regulatorycompliancebybackoffice vendors or outsourced agencies
appointed by MIIs and their members
or participants, MIIs must establish
policies fortheirappointmentandmonitoring. These policies should clearly
identify potentialrisks associated with
such vendors or agencies and outline
measures to mitigate them.
Additionally, thepoliciesmustdefine
minimum standards or thresholds,
both qualitative and quantitative that
vendors must meet to qualify for
appointment, including standards for
technology vendors.