HC dismisses suit against Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin’s appointment

 

 

THE Bombay High Court on Tuesday held the appointment of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin as the 53rd al-Dai al-Mutlaq (leader) of the Dawoodi Bohra community as valid, dismissing a 2014 suit challenging his position. The court has “only decided on the issue of proof and not faith”, a single bench of Justice Gautam Patel said while dismissing the suit initially filed by Khuzaima Qutbuddin soon after his brother and the then Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin passed away in January 2014 at the age of 102. Burhanuddin’s second son, Mufaddal Saifuddin, then took over as the Syedna. In 2016, after Qutbuddin passed away, his son Taher Fakhruddin took over the suit, claiming his father had conferred the powers on him.

 

The suit sought the court to restrain Saifuddin from discharging his duties as Syedna. Qutbuddin had, in his suit, claimed his brother Burhanuddin appointed him as the “mazoon” (second in command) and privately anointed him as his successor through a secret “nass” (conferment of succession) before the “mazoon” announcement on December 10, 1965. Justice Patel, however, held that the plaintiff was unable to prove that a valid “nass” was conferred upon him. Justice Patel, while dismissing the suit, said, “I don’t want any upheavals. I have kept the judgment as neutral as possible. I have only decided on the issue of proof and not faith.” Fakhruddin claimed that his father conferred and appointed him for the position before dying. The Dawoodi Bohras are a religious denomination among Shia Muslims. Traditionally a community of traders and entrepreneurs, it has more than 5 lakh members in India and more than 10 lakh across the world. The community’s top religious leader is known as the Dai-al-Mutlaq (most senior). As per faith and Dawoodi Bohra doctrine, a successor is appointed through “divine inspiration”.

 

A “nass” can be conferred upon any deserving member of the community and not necessarily a family member of the current Dai, although the latter is often the practice. The suit had sought the high court to restrain Saifuddin from acting as the Dai-al-Mutlaq. It also sought entry to Saifi Manzil, the house of the Syedna in Mumbai, alleging that Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin had taken over the leadership role in a “fraudulent manner”. Qutbuddin claimed that after Burhanuddin became the new Dai-al-Mutlaq, taking over from his father Syedna Taher Saifuddin in 1965, he publicly appointed his half-brother as the “mazoon” (second in command) and privately anointed him as his successor through a secret “nass”. Burhanuddin asked him to keep the private “nass” a secret, Qutbuddin claimed. He maintained that he abided by the oath of secrecy given to him by the 52nd Dai till his death. Syedna Saifuddin opposed the suit, claiming the “nass” of 1965 lacked witnesses and could not be accepted. He claimed that as per the established and prevalent doctrines of the Dawoodi Bohra faith, “nass” could be changed and revoked. As per the Syedna’s claims, on June 4, 2011, the 52nd Dai conferred “nass” on Syedna Saifuddin in the presence of witnesses at a hospital in London, where he was admitted after suffering a stroke. Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin’s supporters welcomed the decision and said it affirmed the position of the Syedna and the Dawoodi Bohra community’s age-old beliefs, customs, practices and doctrines.